tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27669571773391410312024-02-20T11:10:34.504-08:00Amanda Santer: Zen and InspirationAmanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.comBlogger80125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-3233541028837658982019-08-31T04:27:00.001-07:002019-08-31T04:27:11.372-07:00There's nothing average about it<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I'm a big fan of Ted talks. The variety, the view points, the range of subjects, the expertise - all fascinating and thought provoking.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I stumbled across this one over the summer, The myth of average by Todd Rose.</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe width="320" height="266" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4eBmyttcfU4/0.jpg" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4eBmyttcfU4?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">If you have 18 minutes to spare, do give it a view - because it was fascinating both in relation to how the US Air Force approached fighter plane design in 1952 or how the structure of the education system is often failing the brightest and most talented students in the US education system. But, at the heart of it, the point was that thinking differently can nurture and harness potential - and that is by not designing for the average.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">As I listened, it struck me that average is everywhere and decisions are made about it and because of it everyday, including in the not for profit sector.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So, the next time you use the term - the average supporter is...., have a think about what that means and also what it doesn't mean for the information you have and the judgement you make. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I am not saying on the basis of one very bright man talking about averages that it hasn't got value - but it was a great reminder that we can generalise because of it - and that could be to the detriment of what we do and what we decide to do next for the programmes we lead, the investment choices we make and for the experience of those that support and engage with our cause.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Thanks as ever for stopping by.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span>Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-65467285150201383272018-09-04T06:15:00.004-07:002018-09-04T08:51:10.381-07:00Not Goodbye, but when will we see you again?Having recently come back from a lovely holiday, at a lovely resort where we received a lovely welcome and recognition that we had been before what on earth could my gripe be I hear you ask?! <br />
<br />
Well it is essentially this. We often put so much more thought and effort into the welcome, that we forget about the goodbye. A goodbye which if you want people coming back to use your service or in our context make a gift, run an event etc. should in fact be a continuation of that wonderful welcome. Instead it has often become transactional and administrative with little thought to when we might see them again or expressing in no uncertain terms that we'd like to.<br />
<br />
Now in the context of fundraising and supporter engagement, is there really an end point - not really, we want to build meaningful on-going relationships with people who want to have relationships but if you look at each engagement a supporter has with you, there is frequently a process that will operationally conclude a certain stage of that engagement i.e. a thank you letter thanking someone for their gift. Is this the fundraising equivalent of checking out of a hotel and paying the bill? Where you pay for the lovely experience and hand over the credit card and receive the reams of paper, and a thank you from the reception staff... and then ....you leave. Mulling over the experience and them hoping you'll return at some point or not?<br />
<br />
Of course, my experience isn't a terrible one by any stretch. People were nice, appreciative, asked if we had had a lovely holiday and wished us a safe flight and all that. All fine and appreciated. But I guess my point is that I think it could be better and I think at those critical stages of engagement - whatever they might be, I think more thought is required to ensure that the supporter's experience is a positive one laying the foundations for the next step.<br />
<br />
So, what I am suggesting is that we look at all of those points, whether it be a thank you letter or a communication to a regular giver that has stopped their gift and ensure that we aren't saying 'goodbye' or 'goodbye forever' but instead asking 'when will we see you again? or at least demonstrating at that point that we'd love to see them again soon.<br />
<br />
Thanks as ever for stopping by.<br />
<br />
AmandaAmanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-39932232139368436672018-07-20T08:21:00.000-07:002018-07-20T08:21:55.545-07:00Fundraisers - we are human after all<br />
As I sat in the National Gallery looking at the fantastic art - impressed by the skill and trying to decide which Van Gogh I preferred, I then caught sight of a self portrait of a young artist. He wasn't known to me (but I am in no way an art connoisseur), but as I looked at this young man who had been a pupil of a great master of the 18th century, I realised my mind was thinking about this person, their life, their motivation, how they may have felt being tutored by someone of brilliance and I realised that this was much more interesting and personal than me admiring the mere work on show.<br />
<br />
As fundraisers, stories are our most valuable asset - we all know that. Obviously there is much more to fundraising than that but the stories we tell are what helps ensure what we do has a human face (or animal) and that in turns drives emotional connection and action.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, we are in a period where we are often judged on the techniques we employ to do our job - rather than the importance of what we do and the impact it makes. More so, when people have strong views on those techniques or indeed when they are wilfully misunderstood - but my point is that I think we need to tell our own stories a bit more. <br />
<br />
There are clearly signatories on our communications and people at the heart of what we do, but the reality is we don't share our stories as fundraisers; of how we got here, why we are doing what we do, or why we are working for the charities we do. We don't necessarily put forward a human face of fundraising - that it is people ultimately working hard to build engagement with supporters and prospective supporters - not lots of machine's churning out letters.<br />
<br />
On the odd occasion that we do, we tell those stories in the bubble of the charity world, not to our donors and supporter, the people who to my mind would benefit from knowing a bit more about the people working behind the scenes. My reason for this is because ultimately if our supporters understand why we do what we do and believe in it and see the impact of that, they may well start seeing us as people wanting to make a better world for people and animals, rather than sales people or amoral people that would do anything to get some money out of them.<br />
<br />
So the next time you send a newsletter or letter for example, maybe test including a picture of a fundraiser involved in creating it, with a little blurb about why they do what they do, why they care.. why they are at the organisation. Allow your organisation to tell its fundraisers' stories or at least try it.<br />
<br />
My short story ... and it doesn't have to be long<br />
<br />
I grew up with a mum who was passionate about animal rights, and I remember the charity letters she received and the petitions she signed all through my childhood. My mum was a proud charity supporter. Later, I remember being moved to tears and anger by Ceausescu's orphans and still, to this day I can recall the horror and despair in the news footage. Those are the things I remember most that motivated me to want to make a difference in some small way.<br />
<br />
Thanks as ever for stopping by.<br />
<br />Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-8507983514943936152016-12-11T08:39:00.002-08:002016-12-11T08:39:32.043-08:00We have to do better <span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Over the last while I have been sharing my experience of 'reactivating' my support to one of my favourite charities after a hiatus. At the time I explained that although my financial support had stopped for a while, my belief and commitment to the cause itself had not waned.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">My frustration for much of this process was in fact the lack of recognition for my past support, the missed opportunity to acknowledge what they already knew about me, to make my support feel valued. After all, I resumed my support spontaneously I wasn't called or mailed, I just took the opportunity to start my financial support again. A perfect example of volunteering versus conscription.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So my story continues. Three months ago I received a telephone call to increase my support. It was actually well scripted and they had obviously done some work to make it dynamic and relevant based on the answers I gave in the conversation. I was convinced and agreed to increase my support, which was about 9 months after I signed up. I was happy to do it.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Over the last three months since the call I have been waiting for my increase to be actioned, but this morning I received a letter. It was signed from the supporter care manager and though pretty innocuous and straight forward in its content it kind of annoyed me.</span><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The letter itself, though factual and apologetic lacked warmth and detail - the delay was caused by an 'external processing error' apparently. We've all been there when we have external suppliers handling fulfilment for our charities' processing - but it's taken three months to notice..</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">A call would have been better than a letter .. or even an attempt to call.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The apology was for inconvenience caused, which if I am being facetious I could argue that I am £15 better off as three months of additional payments have not been taken. That being said the main issue for me is that feeling that this additional support that was so vital and imperative in the call is no longer that important. It certainly didn't factor in the letter message at all which I feel is a mistake particularly after this amount of time lag.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The letter format itself - and yes, I am being picky now but the name and address is a different print density from the main letter, so it feels knocked up rather than specially drafted to apologise to me personally as a supporter. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Not even a 'Merry Christmas' or something suitably non denominational included (it's two weeks away from December 25th!).</span></li>
</ul>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">This tale, though a bit of a saga is essentially meant to highlight something that we all should know as fundraisers and communicators. Which is that the stages after the fundraising is just as vital as the work that goes into the main campaign or activity. All that work that went into a rather good fundraising call has been undermined by processes and now a lacklustre supporter care letter.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">With even greater scrutiny on how we fundraise and communicate with our supporters and potential supporters which is making things much more challenging - supporter care should no longer be the after thought. It should be planned in upfront with the campaign itself, and done so with fundraiser input to ensure that the experience of elevating the thank you and supporter care around the campaigns is tight and of the highest quality as possible.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It's the time of year, and I could be being a little Grinch like about this - but it's a hard environment and in the coming year, support will be won and lost by the service that supporters and donors receive during sign-up, after sign-up and every stage after that. So we should stop making our letters look admin like (even if they are), we need to ensure that systems are in place to limit mistakes (more so than ever) but if mistakes do happen that we ensure there is warmth and authenticity in the explanation and the apology. I don't think that is too much to ask.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Thank you kind reader as ever for stopping by and wishing you a very merry Christmas!</span></div>
Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-84527037151396287182016-07-04T06:18:00.001-07:002016-07-04T06:18:51.490-07:00What do you want, blood?<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Currently there's lots of discussion about what makes a great donor experience, and equally greater discussion about how that is delivered. So I thought I would share this, because I think it speaks for itself.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">As with everything we do in fundraising, it isn't rocket science. At its heart it is about being authentic, genuine and sincere and the fact that this was delivered by mobile also goes to show that all channels are a potentially great vehicle for delivery of feedback if the organisation genuinely has something to say to the donor. In fact for this, text was the perfect choice.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-K7tFuCKZVtwz5q4a7GSKJUxVvKQ8S0NiC9oCTIrAJ6aGi-l08SniKL2DHQUArrNJPNjaaL-D1R5Oirg2WxLNDAanmT_wWWpg_murPYjKgNc-m-Ux_JAYCXkfg9xcsBdTkBnzGduevggo/s1600/Impact.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-K7tFuCKZVtwz5q4a7GSKJUxVvKQ8S0NiC9oCTIrAJ6aGi-l08SniKL2DHQUArrNJPNjaaL-D1R5Oirg2WxLNDAanmT_wWWpg_murPYjKgNc-m-Ux_JAYCXkfg9xcsBdTkBnzGduevggo/s320/Impact.PNG" width="251" /></span></a></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Clearly for the person who received this message, this text has made their blood donation and the impact of that donation meaningful and real. What more could you ask for.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Hat tip to my colleague Carol who spotted this on Facebook.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Thanks as ever for stopping by.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Amanda</span> Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-31249224931662276652016-02-27T00:06:00.002-08:002016-02-27T00:06:53.363-08:00Show me you know me...<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Okay, so I was lamenting a little following my recent engagement with an organisation's supporter care team of which I decided to resume my support.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">As I said at the time it wasn't a bad experience at all, but my disappointment related to the fact that as a previous, and dare I say generous supporter of more than a decade - I thought it would have been 'nice' to be recognised in that way.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">You can read what I had to say about it all </span><a href="http://zenandinpsiration.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/dont-neglect-people-who-want.html"><span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">here</span></a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Practically I thought to myself afterwards, maybe the person just didn't do the research ahead of calling me or didn't have time - all very possible in a busy supporter care team. But, now that they are aware, I thought to myself I might receive the confirmation letter that does acknowledge that I returned to the fold and resumed my monthly commitment.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Okay, so I am here to tell you that no - that was not the case either. There was nothing beyond the usual generated letter thanking me, confirming the details of my regular monthly gift and briefly explaining the difference it will make. Which I knew anyway as I had supported before!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">So why am I so disappointed. Am I disappointed as a supporter or a fundraiser - probably both.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">I don't expect the CEO to knock on my door with balloons that say thank you - honestly I don't - but I think what this experience clearly demonstrates is just how much of what we do is automated and homogenous and that this is at the expense of genuine, tailored supporter care and relationship building.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">I would have hoped that the person I spoke to would have taken note that I had resumed my support and that there would be a way to personalise the letter I received - or even if that wasn't possible (and I am giving some benefit of the doubt on that one), a post it note, a compliments slip or a even a PS. just acknowledging that fact and saying thank you for coming back. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: "arial";"></span><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Though my interaction with this organisation was paused transactionally, it doesn't mean that I wasn't watching in the wings, watching the progress. As much as some people question what they are lapsing from in the 'I didn't have a relationship with you in the first place' way, I can tell you from experience that just because I stopped my support for a while, I still felt like a supporter. I still certainly cared. And I don't think that is unique to me.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">As a fundraiser I know how rare it is relatively speaking for supporters to resume their support, so as a supporter who has done just that I wanted to feel valued, special and have that fact acknowledged. It's there in my data, it was there in the conversation I had it was just no where to be seen when it came to the confirmation and to me that is another missed opportunity to make me, the donor feel special. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Thanks as ever for stopping by.</span><br />
<br />Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-18138857617861018522016-02-12T04:37:00.000-08:002016-02-12T04:37:05.031-08:00Don't neglect the people who want a relationship with you<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Just</span> the other day, I decided to resume support of one of my favourite causes. I had stopped giving a while ago and wanted to start giving again. It was the right time for me to do so.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">I completed the form on-line, and in haste transposed some of my account details. As a result, I received a call from the organisation's supporter care team. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">I confirmed my details - now accurately. I confirmed the amount. And I was even asked whether I had seen anything to prompt my giving. All good. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Now this is where it wasn't so good, I had supported previously for a long time, and made additional gifts on top of my Direct Debit, but there was no mention of that fact in the call - a lost opportunity to demonstrate they knew me - to welcome me back.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">When I confirmed my details - I was not asked about Gift Aid. I mentioned it. The women on the phone said we probably have it from the last time - which she checked and that was the case. But it might not have been.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Finally, I am a previous supporter, who has just proactively signed up to resume my support and in the current environment I would have certainly asked about contact preferences. Would I have opted-in to telephone - yes of course! I would have opted-in to all of them - explicit agreement to receive communications from them, but I was not asked and the subject was not even raised. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Yes, of course my previous preferences could still stand. But coming back to the point that I proactively resumed my support - there was an opportunity missed to market consent to me and to check that I was happy with what had gone before. Another opportunity to engage me in a positive way and elevate the call beyond one of mere transaction.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">And there it is. It seems that as a sector we are so obsessed with the 'new' that we are not very good at dealing with and maximising on, the opportunities that come to us. In this case in the form of an engaged, proactive supporter who likes the cause so much that they will probably do what is asked and so much more. But being mindful of these rare folk just seems to be an after thought - and that mind set really does need to change.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Thanks as ever for stopping by.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"> </span>Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-29831682028096242262015-12-15T02:37:00.000-08:002015-12-15T02:39:32.647-08:00The power of a donor promise<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">I was compelled to write this because in the current uncertain charity environment, I think anything that shows the positive impact that focusing on the donor and giving them a choice has, is worth sharing.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">We recently sent out a mailing to people not currently donating to Sense - asking for £15 to support Sense's work with children who are deafblind. On the back of the donation form was our supporter promise - headlined as <span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>'Our Promise to you' </strong></span></span><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>- </strong>on<strong> </strong>which a kind donor had written the following: </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<em><span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><strong>'I was going to give you £15 but when I saw this promise (I've never seen it before from anyone!), I decided to give you more!! But only write to me once a year.'</strong></span></em><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Donor promises are now ever present, and they have now become an integral part of many charity communications. For us it is now a standing element on all communications, whether to existing donors or to those we are looking to attract support from, so I think the fact that the donor hadn't seen it anywhere before is just our fortune. </span><span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">That being said the incredibly kind donor actually donated £100 in the end with the promise of the same each year. Amazing.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";">So if you think the Donor Promise is just words to our donors, it is clear they are not. I know we are taking them seriously as charities - and we need to ensure that we keep those promises - but there is something really heartening to see it having such a positive impact.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";">Thanks as ever for stopping by.</span>Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-24323985163067439202015-11-09T06:16:00.001-08:002015-11-09T08:19:51.603-08:00It would be nice not to be asked!<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">As fundraisers, we balance our communications with asks, stewardship and feedback. Of course essentially all of these things are basically making a case for what our organisations do and why we do it and vitally why we need their support to help us make the difference. But some communications are more direct i.e. an appeal while others are more about demonstrating progress such as a feedback. Nothing surprising here of course most fundraising programmes would have the mix.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">What is increasing noticeable to me though is how these are deployed for people that are no longer apparently giving to you. Now obviously there is no scientific methodology behind this, but I have been monitoring over the last 6 months what I have been receiving from organisations that I have given to in the past but to which I wouldn't class myself as a donor. Equally data wise based on a RFV criteria I would certainly not be deemed as an 'active' supporter. But interestingly, out of 7 communications I have received, only one of them hasn't been a direct appeal for money.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Now in thinking about this, it appears that there is a prevalent approach that assumes that lapsed or lapsing cash givers just need another opportunity to give again to change their status back to active again, and I am not going to lie and say that there isn't a lapsed segment in the recent appeal selection, it's Christmas after all. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">However personally, from my little audit, I really appreciated the feedback, but wasn't overly moved by the appeals. And as much as I am a professional fundraiser and proud to be so, I am also a charity donor.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">So what would happen if we tested including apparently lapsed supporters in our feedback selections? And monitoring their onward behaviour? My answer is I don't know yet, but am going to see what happens, because as a charity giver I was happy to receive the feedback, and I read it. Would it have had the same impact had it been 1 of 7 feedback communications? I can't say, but that isn't what is happening currently in my experience so I believe there is a real opportunity to see what difference a change of approach could make or at least mix it up a bit.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">If you think about the donations you receive from supporters in response to feedback mailings in general, in my experience it's worth a test. Last year our legacy ask mailing generated several thousand pounds of donations with no direct financial ask made, and similarly I have had the same experience with other feedback communications, I'm sure we all have. Feedback generates response, financial and also people genuinely pleased to receive it and who will tell you so.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";">So as a charity giver, active or otherwise, sometimes it would be nice not to be asked or at least not in a heavy handed way...let your great work do the talking and maybe I'll be motivated to give again if I can - but will certainly remember you for it.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";">Thanks as ever for stopping by.</span>Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-33037565103856077612015-10-23T05:57:00.001-07:002015-11-02T02:25:47.116-08:00Let there be (relationship fundraising) light.<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">It wasn't so much a light bulb moment, rather illumination. Bear with me, the puns have a reason.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">This week I received a little leaflet from a well known shop - it wasn't a full catalogue, just a few pages promoting lights, with a little inducement to buy .. the usual sales promotion.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Now as I flicked through the mini brochure, my husband made a comment, 'you bought one light and now you are on a list'. 'Yep', I replied,' that's how it...works'. Oh dear, I thought - this is all based on rather large assumption or presumption. As a colleague noted, a bit like going on one date and changing your Facebook status to 'in a relationship'.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">And aren't we often very guilty of that presumption ourselves in the charity sector? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Someone who donates once, we label them a donor or supporter or even differentiate and put 'new' at the start, but they are not are they? We then work tirelessly to appeal to these new people to inspire them (hopefully) to support with another gift - without understanding why they gave in the first place, what their expectation is of that gift and what that gift means in terms of inviting on-going dialogue? But we've all seen the stat, the one that shows just how few people do actually go on to give again....</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">I did buy a light from the shop, it was a great light... and should I want another light I would think of the company because of how good their light was - It's still working and looks great, and not because they want to sell me some lights today. The question they have not asked me, but assumed is that I am in the market for another light.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Some could argue that data protection ascertains this... well it might if for the longest time it wasn't hidden in small print at the bottom of the page. But even then not really.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";">In reality, there will always be a % of people who have given to you once, that have no intention of going on to do so again - irrespective of what the data protection opt-in and outs say. Then there are those that I am sure haven't really thought that far ahead but what that means is the thank you is a critical stage - this is not the time for an admin letter style no, this is time for real demonstrable gratitude and inspiration. Wow them! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";">So as well as building great relationships with supporters we need to make sure that people want a relationship in the first place - and we need to be braver about asking that. If they do - give them the power to dictate what that relationship is. We can then work our hardest to ensure that this is the most rewarding and enjoyable relationship in the world! </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";">And for those that don't? Well these kind people have given to your cause, received a wonderful thank you and importantly been given a choice which may one day convert into a relationship and one of great value, but even if not, at least they will have had a wonderful experience and will be likely tell others about it.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial";">Thanks as ever for stopping by.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.M70ab08a9af02d9cbfbbdece2be7a68e3o0&w=154&h=206&c=7&rs=1&qlt=90&pid=3.1&rm=2" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.M70ab08a9af02d9cbfbbdece2be7a68e3o0&w=154&h=206&c=7&rs=1&qlt=90&pid=3.1&rm=2" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a><a href="http://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.M70ab08a9af02d9cbfbbdece2be7a68e3o0&w=154&h=206&c=7&rs=1&qlt=90&pid=3.1&rm=2" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a><br /></div>
<a href="http://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.M70ab08a9af02d9cbfbbdece2be7a68e3o0&w=154&h=206&c=7&rs=1&qlt=90&pid=3.1&rm=2" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a><br />Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-51573691022173614442015-03-24T08:40:00.001-07:002015-03-24T08:40:32.274-07:00What you get if you mix a Direct Debit error, an apology letter and a conversation with a donor?<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I caught up with a friend the other day, who, knowing what I do always has an opinion. In fact he has an opinion on what I do because he is a supporter of charity - so his opinion comes from his experience and attitude to what the sector does from his experience. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So, this was interesting. He had just received a letter from a charity to which several months earlier he had upgraded his Direct Debit. The letter, detailed the fact that though he kindly increased his gift from £10 to £20 per month, that the previous direct debit had not been cancelled and thus the charity had been taking both amounts for the last 7 months. They owed him £70.00.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">As he handed me the letter he said 'If I was them, I wouldn't have done it like that.' </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So, I read on. The charity explained the error and advised that £70 had been credited into his account. Nothing too contentious and unusual there I thought.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">'What wouldn't you have done?' I quizzed, 'given back the money?'. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">'Of course I would have given back the money, but I would have used the letter to highlight the mistake, check the account details were still active as a tactic (though of course they are), and said if we don't here back in xx days, we will refund the money into your account.' Was his reply.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Interesting I said, how would you have felt on the receiving end of such a letter?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">'Fine, I didn't notice the £70 had been taken - so I would have probably contacted them and told them to keep the money. Like maybe 1-2% of other people may have done.'</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Me: 'You can still make the donation.'</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Friend: 'No, that would require me to write a cheque or give my credit card details - giving to charity is actually quite hard and time consuming - so no, now I have the money back it would be a hassle to give it again.'</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Now, as you read this, it might have caused you to cast your mind back to when there have been such mistakes in your own programmes. What did you do? What would you do? </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Yes, a % of those people, like my friend, could have said don't worry just keep the money - would those that received that letter with an extra stage felt aggrieved that the money wasn't automatically credited? We could assume yes, but would they?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I am sharing this because for me a few things stood out:</span><br />
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It would appear that in the face of errors and mistakes and to be honest quite a bad one in this instance, supporters can be quite relaxed and understanding about them. This is not to suggest that when mistakes happen we shouldn't treat them seriously, but there is a comfort to be had from the idea that people are quite understanding if the issue is communicated in the right way.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Though I was personally not at all surprised by the approach the charity took in dealing with the error in this case - my friend genuinely thought this was a lost opportunity for income generation and would have been perfectly happy with an opportunity to decide whether he wanted his money back. Do we too frequently second guess our supporters? </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">My friend may be unique in this but his point about giving to charity being difficult really stood out for me (another post for another time). But are we doing enough to break down the barriers to giving - the emotional and the physical ones? </span></li>
</ul>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">As he put the letter away, I thanked him - I love the fact that someone wholly unrelated to the charity or not-for-profit sector has such a strong opinion - which is ultimately coming from a very committed charity giver perspective. Even more reason to harness that feedback and more importantly seek it out. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Thanks as ever for stopping by.</span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-42673998950317154492014-12-05T05:23:00.000-08:002014-12-14T00:40:05.514-08:00A cash to committed campaign - and I don't mean Direct Debit.....<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">As a fundraiser one of my preoccupations is how we can engender the same 'commitment' from cash givers that we get with the regularity of the mechanism of Direct Debit giving. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Now before any one comments on the over simplification of the concept of commitment or indeed possibly unfair comparison, the point is, we have all seen the slide that shows the second gift rates of cash givers. They have pretty much lapsed before they have posted their gift or pressed the donate button on your website.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So a while ago I won an opportunity to 'test' an idea I had with <a href="http://www.ethicall.org.uk/">Ethicall telephone agency</a>. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So, this is an update.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So, 1000 supporters were called, all of which would be in the 25+ recency bracket since their last gift.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> The approach was to call them, and essentially ask them without any legally binding wording, whether they would be willing to commit or pledge to support 1,2 or 3 of the appeals Sense mails throughout the year. At best it would provide us with a baseline to monitor and at worst a great opportunity to offer a supporter care call.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> So the findings:</span><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">291 people agreed to pledge - 255 to all three appeals </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">On being asked, supporters genuinely pondered the question and it was either all in most cases or not at all. Whereas I thought we'd get a lot of people saying they would support the Christmas appeal only, this was not the case at all. The call, offering a robust case for support, seemed to resonate with the supporters called. For those that refused they seemed happy with the call and could understand 'why' they were called but didn't feel they could commit. For those supporters it was a good opportunity to have a chat, offer thanks and reiterate the importance of their commitment.</span></li>
</ul>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
For each appeal following the calling campaign, we included as a segment those that 'pledged' to give, as well as those that were contacted but refused and a segment of those that were non contacts to the calling.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />Results from last appeal</span><br />
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">12% of people who did pledge to the call responded to the appeal - that was twice the rate of those that were not contacted during the calling campaign</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Those that were contacted during the call but didn't pledge were also 50% more responsive than those not contacted</span></li>
</ul>
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Now, it is early days and some big caveats. This was based on a very small number of calls and beyond the recency - there was little further criteria applied in the segmentation. However, the interesting things to me are:</span><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">How seriously and considered people's approach was to the pledge - all or nothing and very little in between. People took the ask seriously. Even when it was easy for them to say yes, I'll just give at Christmas, for example.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The response rate of people to an appeal who received the call but didn't feel they could pledge at the time really reminded me yet again of the power of the telephone and the importance of just having a chance to have a positive dialogue with your supporters. </span></li>
</ul>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">We are of course continuing to monitor this group, and also looking to find ways to ensure that as many conversations with our supporters take place as possible. Obviously to our finance team there was questions over the immediate return in that there wasn't one if we had to pay for all of the calls - that being said even if you don't have a huge supporter care team, making sure you try to prioritise supporter care calls is sure to have a positive impact. None of this is rocket science of course, but timely reminders always help to focus the mind I think.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Thanks as ever for stopping by and thanks again to <a href="http://www.ethicall.org.uk/">Ethicall </a>for the chance to try out the idea.</span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-40930137641476143732014-11-25T12:08:00.001-08:002014-11-27T03:25:10.270-08:00Are your Data Protection statements improving supporter relationships or hindering them?<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Oh no, I hear you cry - a post about data protection. Well, it is and it isn't. We have all heard about the EU plans to reform the current legislation, the outcome of which could be with us as early as 2017 and much of which could have a serious impact should it go ahead as is.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">However, this post is more about how we can better frame data protection and what it means in order to strengthen relationships with potential and existing supporters rather than jeopardising them through a lack of understanding. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">So, a short tale - with an happy ending.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Very recently one of Sense's supporters emailed to cancel his Direct Debit. He didn’t like being
telephoned and had received a call recently. We let him know how much we really valued his support and of course that we would do what he asked but also let him know that we can communicate with him in the way he prefers. If that means no future telephone calls then of course. The supporter as a result decided not to cancel his direct
debit. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">A big high five for good supporter care! </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">However, what was interesting, was the supporter's understanding before we explained we would ensure that he wouldn't receive further calls:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"> </span><br />
<div class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">"I didn't realise at the time I sent the e-mail that it
was possible not to be </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">contacted in this way."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Interesting really - the thought that some of our supporters who opt-in or don't opt-out of receiving various communications from us feel it is for life rather than that there is a control that is in their hands.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">In this instance we were able to explain this to our kind donor who continued his support. But how many are silently leaving without that dialogue?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">So though the legal guidelines are set in terms of gaining consent to communicate, a simple line stating that you can let us know at any time should your wishes change should be a clear message alongside any data protection statements.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">This simple message may very well help ensure that instead of a supporter leaving entirely because they decide they don't like a channel of communication after all, that they just let us know and allow us to adhere to their wishes and provide great supporter care at the same time.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Thanks as ever for stopping by.</span>Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-1659356992845694972014-11-07T13:46:00.000-08:002014-11-10T12:35:11.430-08:00What we can learn from Where's Wally?Creating something people will actively look at and respond to is what drives the communications we produce as fundraisers, and that is why <a href="http://findwally.co.uk/">'Where's Wally'</a> can offer such inspiration. Mainly because that is the main point. Visually arresting scenes, where readers scour the pages in pursuit of an array of characters as well as Wally (a traveller with a penchant for red and white stripes and bobble hats), while taking in the visual puns and humour that entertains us.<br />
<br />
So relevance to us as fundraisers? One is around the truth that very few supporters will be compelled to read our communications and if they do, not in same detail and possibly with the same level of interest or purpose.<br />
<br />
Engagement with communications is easier if the format suits the audience and not the designer - finding Wally is much easier when you have the bigger books for example.<br />
<br />
There's nothing wrong with repetitiveness of either the story or the ask within it. Where's Wally has been around since 1987, it's ultimately the same thing but in different contexts, yet it still doesn't get old. The important things is relevance to the person reading.<br />
<br />
On the other side of this though, is some of the things that are inherent in the success of Where's Wally, which we should try to avoid.<br />
<br />
The characters are intentionally hidden and obscured, the challenge is to find them. This is the opposite of what your copy and design needs to. Too clever, and you lose people. Too complicated people will not persevere to understand what you are saying. So be clear on the following:<br />
<br />
Why are you writing now?<br />
What are you asking them to do - exactly?<br />
If it's money you are asking for it, then ask!<br />
<br />
On this point Where's Wally is clear, you need to find him and his friends. Simple. And there is a lot to be said for it. Now back to Wally, I am sure I saw woof's tail somewhere...<br />
<br />
Thanks as ever for stopping by.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-10494971178308172842014-10-22T06:32:00.000-07:002014-11-03T05:35:48.941-08:00What Donors can learn from surveys<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I am very much in favour of supporter surveys - ultimately if executed properly it can genuinely result in improving what we do as fundraisers and more widely as organisations. That is of course the point - hopefully. We learn new things about our supporters that can help us find other supporters, and it is a useful communication to provide supporters with other ways to engage with us.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">On the other side of it though is the benefit that is passed on to the supporters themselves. The opportunity to have an opinion, should they want to take it. An opportunity to feel that they are being listened to (as long as they are), and that in turn has a benefit for fundraisers because such opportunities provide great supporter care and often result in additional support. All very positive.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">But one of the less overt benefits for a supporter, which also has a positive benefit to the organisation is that of re-engagement or reconnection with the cause. I say this from a recent experience.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I support <a href="https://www.soidog.org/">Soi Dog Foundation</a> - a great animal welfare organisation in Thailand concerned with the welfare of cats and dogs. Very recently I was asked to complete a survey - which I did for two reasons. One because they asked and two, because they asked so nicely in a way that made me feel they valued my views. A snippet of the email below:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 16.2pt;">
<b><span style="color: black; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; mso-bidi-font-family: "Segoe UI"; mso-bidi-font-size: 24.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><em>Please, Let Us Know What You Think...</em></span></b><span style="color: black; font-family: "Segoe UI","sans-serif"; font-size: 4pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<em><span style="color: black; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Segoe UI"; mso-bidi-font-size: 18.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">Dear Amanda,</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Segoe UI","sans-serif"; font-size: 4pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><o:p></o:p></span></em><br />
<em><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></em><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 16.2pt;">
<em><span style="color: black; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Segoe UI"; mso-bidi-font-size: 18.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">I would like to personally thank you
for your support of the dogs and cats who you help. It is you who are helping
the animals. Your donations are what allows for this important life saving work
to continue.</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Segoe UI","sans-serif"; font-size: 4pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><o:p></o:p></span></em></div>
<em><span style="color: black; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Segoe UI"; mso-bidi-font-size: 18.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">Soi Dog would like to know your
thoughts about how your donations are used and how you feel we can best help
dogs and cats working together.</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Segoe UI","sans-serif"; font-size: 4pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><o:p></o:p></span></em><br />
<em><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></em><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 16.2pt;">
<em><span style="color: black; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Segoe UI"; mso-bidi-font-size: 18.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">Soi Dog runs a number of animal welfare
programs and I'd like to get your feedback on how <span style="font-family: Times, "Times New Roman", serif;">important you feel the
various programs are.</span></span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Segoe UI","sans-serif"; font-size: 4pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><o:p></o:p></span></em></div>
<span style="color: black; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Segoe UI"; mso-bidi-font-size: 18.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><span style="font-family: Times, "Times New Roman", serif;"><em>Can I ask you a favour? Can you take a
few moments and complete Soi Dog's Supporter Survey? Please take a moment and
fill out the survey by </em></span><a href="http://email.soidog.org/wf/click?upn=zNIJnrfE1Gu2LteATJYSVsXYPwyQjMej3WK5jj4msXdm-2BPVYpx7OgePLW7bkTXSLd9s7b8KNSzFyyk8UA7u4c-2BnuzGmQGPoXnhOUFJ-2BXMgSjN6DYJlFClUx-2BT7NSPO5MSlIteUDSsHXl6w-2FV4wmizw-3D-3D_S6aQ135BGJn-2BtdkoYRorrX3lIbbgDd-2BsbEyAAQxSN-2Fsm-2Be-2FMqb61jvDSI9HNPfNQTBvxBr-2FOV758ccae3Xhzn3vgb9B-2Bkp9uDD-2B2vIO3RuDo-2BoFdGefeQKOeDnQpYxWfJZDTPdUh1h-2BNt3L6nMsfrRkTevyIHM3HW0K0ooi1bALS2GScJgPfJPnrkSWfqAWgrHneAL39Y3Xcp0A3-2FMO7mIKbuuLgqNmn57F5QnBh049BfOzHxOYP4MGSBNwveOnblg-2BPvpyA8no42au8aOjojmthqfd-2BlK-2B2ax1eEXdwOV1A1Cv0KLtC4Xlqqypskxm5GZToEk0cNcJAj72dwJK-2FLiRAPiP4VRao0YtuvLlREQ1KMn4F4Ibc1mf-2Fn2tupl10xUUxfQMzWpM-2FKTsLcDnGug-3D-3D" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0072c6; font-family: Times, "Times New Roman", serif; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;"><em>clicking here</em></span></a><span style="font-family: Times, "Times New Roman", serif;"><em> or on the button below:</em></span></span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Segoe UI","sans-serif"; font-size: 4pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><o:p></o:p></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Much of the questions and the navigation were as you would expect - and it took the opportunity to find out what other ways I would be willing to support and also whether I was interested in Gifts In Wills (I am expecting a legacy follow up at some point), but what was more thought provoking was two questions asked towards the end.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">1. What is it uniquely about <a href="https://www.soidog.org/">Soi Dog</a> that led to you becoming a supporter?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">2. If you could summarise<a href="https://www.soidog.org/"> Soi Dog</a> in three words, what would those words be?</span><br />
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></a><a href="https://www.blogger.com/" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I really needed think in order to answer them honestly and fairly. Amazing really how difficult a question 'What led to your support of xx' is to answer instantly beyond 'I care about animals' for example. Yet, we often start telephone scripts with such questions in the hope to build a dialogue. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So, what was it about the charity that specifically made me want to support? What three words would I use? The process of recalling the when and they why brought back the feelings attached to my initial decision thus reinvigorating my support. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Don't get me wrong, they were not deeply suppressed feelings, and I am not in the inertia marketing phase by any means but it was a genuinely re-affirming experience.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So much so, that when I saw a recent campaign and donation ask around the <a href="https://www.soidog.org/">Soi Dog's</a> work around the </span><a href="https://savedogs.soidog.org/billboards"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Dog Meat trade</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> I signed the petition and donated to fund a billboard! (great campaign by the way).</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Today, I also received a very lovely email, thanking me for taking the survey and how important my opinions are but also playing back my key support - which I thought was a nice touch. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">This is of course not rocket science, but I wanted to share it, because it is easy to focus on what we can learn through such communications, but may be forget the value they have for the person completing them and actually with a bit of thought could actually proactively remind supporters of why they support you in the first place.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Thank you as ever for stopping by.</span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a><br />
Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-31142893815274941782014-08-02T04:37:00.000-07:002014-08-04T05:09:54.342-07:00When things get personalPersonalisation can and should by a key element of supporter communications - I say <i>can be</i>, as sometimes in an attempt to let supporters know that we know them, its use can sometimes be likened to a hammer cracking a nut. Heavy handed.<br />
<br />
That is why I wanted to share this example. Because personally, and that is what it is about ultimately, I like how <a href="http://www.ican.org.uk/">I CAN</a>, the charity that help children communicate, have done it.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEja9ePNBRFMbS43RO4VK8Pj3DbMwkzkVsOiSfDhyQkE_bLHB3085k9Qp5xByuy3nOw67A7KRzpRQEpW_X1IAc9ESR1q3LyRyzHfVGnFV8OsJnIt2aQw8KOYtyHaQYF8PpvbCop2JlhIS817/s1600/20140802_120514.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEja9ePNBRFMbS43RO4VK8Pj3DbMwkzkVsOiSfDhyQkE_bLHB3085k9Qp5xByuy3nOw67A7KRzpRQEpW_X1IAc9ESR1q3LyRyzHfVGnFV8OsJnIt2aQw8KOYtyHaQYF8PpvbCop2JlhIS817/s1600/20140802_120514.png" height="320" width="240" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Simply. It fits with the actual creative of the pack - which opens with<br />
<br />
"Can't was never a word I was prepared to accept when I was fighting for my son to get the support he needed to learn to speak." A honest, heartfelt account of a mother's fight for her son. And goes on to explain how I CAN has transformed their lives.<br />
<br />
It is putting me at the heart of the solution for other families who may need I CAN in the future both in terms of the design and the narrative.<br />
<br />
My name was used only once - not a hundred times unnecessarily. Back to my hammer and nut point above.<br />
<br />
The negative is that the variable text was in a different colour to the letter - which is a shame but I assume a production or budget limitation and not one that I will hold against them.<br />
<br />
So, can I support their work with another gift? Yes, I CAN.<br />
<br />
Thanks as ever for stopping by.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-5848222945321805952014-05-31T09:02:00.003-07:002014-06-16T07:41:30.344-07:00How are you making your supporters feel?In an industry that should be about building relationships with the people who support our vital work, it strikes me that we do not leverage those relationships to their best effect. In fact in some cases we seem to be oblivious to the opportunities or choosing to ignore the chance to turn every transaction into a positive interaction with our supporters.<br />
<br />
A small thing, but a friend of mine recently increased their support to the charity they have supported for a while. He increased his Direct Debit after a conversation with a telephone fundraiser who called. He remembered the conversation and thought it was a good call. He was happy to increase his support.<br />
<br />
The next time I saw him, knowing what I do, he made a point of showing me the confirmation letter. It was pretty standard to be honest but he seemed a bit disappointed. I asked him what would improve it from his perspective and his response was quite interesting - "I didn't speak to the person who signed the letter, I spoke to someone else entirely. If anything my relationship was with the person I spoke to - it didn't even reference the person I spoke with".<br />
<br />
It made me smile. A simple observation, but would it be the hardest thing in the world to at least reference the person who makes the calls on our behalf or the street or door to door fundraisers that sign up the supporters for example? <br />
<br />
I know some organisations do and it is something I have done in the past but why stop there, why not have the street or telephone fundraiser themselves or whoever made the contact as the signatory? We capture the information, or if not it is certainly available, so why not make use of it. In fact there is so much more we could be doing to link up our supporter interactions.<br />
<br />
Don't get me wrong, my friend isn't going to end his support or decide against the increase just because of the signatory of his letter, but after a positive experience - it all ended up a little flat.<br />
<br />
This is not new and as I note, I am certain there are organisations that are already doing this. <br />
<br />
My point is that despite the constraints on day to day operations, we need to do more to ensure that the overall supporter experience is as solid as possible. Taking the opportunity to turn transactions into interactions. So, it doesn't end with the thank you or confirmation letter being mailed - it's also about what the person who receives the letter/email thinks and feels about it and is it consistent with their earlier experience. I certainly think that is worth thinking about.<br />
<br />
Thanks as ever for stopping by.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-19532625654456407312014-01-20T05:38:00.000-08:002014-01-20T12:05:48.516-08:00More on mobile - one charity's experience to date.<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Following on from the absolutely <a href="http://openfundraising.com/blog/">refreshing post</a> last week from<a href="https://twitter.com/pauldegregorio"> Paul de Gregorio</a> from <a href="http://openfundraising.com/">Open Fundraising </a>about mobile - I wanted to add my two pence worth. We've been offering Regular Giving via mobile for just over a year now at <a href="http://www.sense.org.uk/">Sense</a> via <a href="http://www.cymba.co.uk/index.php">Cymba</a>, so still early days, but I wanted to echo and add a couple of other points from my experience to date. I stress this is just one experience of one charity.</span><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Yes, Mobile Regular Givers will give more if asked by way of another one off gift - and that response varies quite considerably depending on how they joined your organisation</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Previous Mobile Regular Givers who have 'lapsed' are also quite generous if asked for a one-off gift via their phone - again this varies depending on how they were recruited to your cause in the first place</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Retention rates on mobile recruitment are not a million miles away from what you would expect for direct debit recruitment. So attrition for RG by mobile recruited on the street is much higher than those converted from PSMS via the telephone for example. No surprise really. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">One of the barriers to click through on content is people feeling they are going to see more information that could upset or make them feel guilty - so being clear, and upbeat on what people will see when they click through has helped increase engagement or so it would appear.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">As does not holding the link to content to ransom. When we first started we would send the link to a new update to those that successfully made a payment that month - now we send it anyway, and people can choose to make the payment or not after they have had the chance to view. We are still reviewing the figures but that to me is the better thing to do.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Regular Gift via your mobile is a great drop ask, there are genuinely people who don't want another direct debit and this does appeal to people who would not have other wise converted. I personally would not advocate a direct to Regular Giving via mobile campaign again for now for Sense - though many charities are having success I am sure. It's just not right for us for now. </span></li>
</ul>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">This is just a year's worth of experience, and one charity example - so please take from it what you will and however many pinches of salt as well. With anything, the best thing to do is test for yourself obviously - but I thought I would share one experience, albeit a limited one of mobile giving. There's much more to test and much more to learn but so far it is has been a positive experience.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Thanks as ever for stopping by. </span>Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-9929181519457855232014-01-13T07:11:00.000-08:002014-01-14T08:09:44.676-08:00How not to do Thank You letters, unless you are Steve MartinI, like many I am sure, read this <a href="http://www.lettersofnote.com/p/the-book.html">wonderful book</a> over Christmas, and I did laugh at this letter from <a href="http://www.lettersofnote.com/search?q=+Steve+Martin">Steve Martin.</a><br />
<br />
Steve Martin wrote this 'highly personalised' letter in response to the fan mail he received. Simple, entertaining, personal... well kind of, just what you would expect from Steve Martin. But he could get away with it, as I dare say he was being 'funny' and the overt token and random personalisation probably made the letter for the people receiving them. Many of the them were probably framed!<br />
<br />
However, beware of a generic thank you letter. Those that are punctuated with a few merged fields - it is something we, as an industry do quite badly in my opinion. <br />
<br />
The worst letters are the ones crafted to be in response to 'ad hoc' gifts where they are not identified as being in response to a particular appeal or campaign but just seen as a general unprompted gift.<br />
<br />
These are the letters that are a 'catch all'. The ones quite often written as an after thought, rarely updated with new and exciting information and frequently full of rhetoric about reaching xxx people and helping charity do x,y,z vaguely. And when you read them, they look and feel as though little effort went into them.<br />
<br />
As much as thanking and asking are about good manners and politeness - the 'thank you' as much as the 'please' needs to be heartfelt and genuine. I am not saying we can physically write each and every letter on our PCs for our kind and lovely donors, but we can work much, much harder in making it look and feel as though we do and that starts from valuing every donation, whatever the channel and motivation and ensuring we are set up to do so with warmth and gratitude.<br />
<br />
Thanks as ever for stopping by.<br />
<br />
<br />Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-67771529056830100602013-12-07T07:19:00.002-08:002013-12-07T07:19:36.439-08:00Donor recovery - is there a way back?A while ago a friend of mine briefly explained her thoughts in relation to cancelling her Direct Debits to charity - and at the end she made the point that she had yet to be contacted by any of the charities.<br />
<br />
To be honest I am a little hung up about reactivation because I do believe it is a neglected element of many supporter care programmes - I say supporter care, because we should care who is ceasing their financial support to us and also why.<br />
<br />
So, I thought I would try this for myself and cancel some of the DDs that I have had in place for several years. To these charities I am not a recent recruit to a high attrition channel so my behaviour is not expected statistically, no, I am a long-standing supporter - who gave generously and also for many years. So what happened.<br />
<br />
Charity 1:<br />
<br />
Within a week of cancelling, I received a telephone call. Polite, upbeat and very much leading with the fact that they could see that my DD was cancelled and whether that was a mistake? It was a nice call but I felt it was interesting that the starting point was that it had somehow been an error - when I had actively cancelled the DD with my bank.<br />
<br />
BACS error codes are numerous and quite granular - and cancelled at bank is a clear and probably a frequently seen code. So would it be rude to actually say what is seen? <i>I see that you cancelled your support to us - would you mind telling me why or if there is anything we could do to help you continue your support? </i>Or something to that effect.<br />
<br />
I say this as for many recovery calls and approaches - there is an inherent problem that unless you find out why someone has cancelled to ascertain if your organisation has specifically failed the person you are purely offering the same again. Whether good, bad or indifferent. Is that really an approach that would engender reactivation for longer than the length of the telephone call? I am not sure it is to be fair.<br />
<br />
Charity 2:<br />
<br />
I received a letter - probably 10 days after the payment was due - it was a standard admin letter - providing me with tick boxes of my intention - either to resume payment or to indicate that I did<br />
intend to leave.<br />
<br />
It was an okay letter to be honest....it contained a warm thanks for my support until now - and then gave me some tick boxes to tick to indicate if the reason for my cancellation was due to 'too many mailings' or that charity x had upset me somehow. Again, all very useful but there was something quite fait accompli about the whole thing. Almost as though they knew it wouldn't work.<br />
<br />
<b>So the question is, is it worth trying to win people back and the bigger question is if you do for how long will they keep giving?</b><br />
<br />
I can't answer that for sure, but what I do believe is that we have more chance of success if we find out what the problem is and if we are ultimately at fault rather than blaming the bank or assuming it is an error. We may as a result learn some invaluable insight, and be able to do something about it. Better than not knowing and carrying on regardless.<br />
<br />
Thanks as ever for stopping by.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-21673601598988839772013-11-11T06:45:00.000-08:002013-11-16T08:00:36.666-08:00Life's ups and downs and why it could change how you view lapsed supporters<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">There is a great song lyric by Barry White <i>'</i></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i>You always have my unspoken passion,<br />
although I might not seem to care.'</i> Now in any relationship this is not much use really. It's good to know of course (if people ever tell you that), but in terms of relationship building and understanding - well it's all a bit rubbish to be honest. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">When you think about it though, it is probably more common than you think.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Life's events like birth, deaths, marriages they all have a profound
affect on relationships - even the strongest ones. Just from my own experience of late - life changes. It throws you curve balls, it means time is something that doesn't exist in the same way as before and your priorities change. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Therefore, how supporters engage with your cause may not be all that different. After all, they are people with lives and life events change things and as a result they may not be able to engage with you in the same way as previously. But I think the worst assumption that we can make therefore is that they all no longer care.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Looking at it from a basic RFV model, in relation to my own commitment to the causes I support and admire based on recent behaviour I would probably be a lapsed cash giver on a few files. The irony is that I like the causes just as much as before, admire the work and am probably still supporting them through Regular Giving - but believe it or not I just fail to get the donation form in the BRE and into the post. I don't think I am alone. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">What that means in a lot of cases is that I stop receiving appeals, or I get letter variants referring to the 'past support' I have shown. When if you looked at the data I may have given to every appeal I was sent three years previously.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Now, this is not an argument for continuing to mail or communicate with 'lapsed' givers in exactly the same way as before, of course some people don't want to support you any more - but I think there is an argument for looking at it from the supporter perspective and acting accordingly. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">This is where working to know as much about your supporters, their life stages, their giving patterns and appreciating the changes in life stage will have an impact on their giving could provide us with a valuable opportunity. One that allows us to better tailor what we do, how we communicate, how we ask and how we facilitate that support.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">DD uplift for one month only as an alternative way of cash giving was something that worked amazingly well when we trialled it at ActionAid - just a tick box. It's still being used. Use of SMS could be so much more than PSMS or RGPSM - it could be a useful way for people to direct and instruct on their giving. My thinking is as much about breaking down barriers to giving as to understanding what the barriers are in the first place. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">It can be tempting to give up on friends if they never get in touch or can't ever make your requests to meet - but in understanding those demands and the pressures acting on your friends ultimately makes for a stronger relationships. Of course the challenge is knowing who is worth the patience but it is worth weighing that up before you decide to stop communicating with whole groups of people entirely.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Thanks as ever for stopping by. </span></span><br />
<br />
<br />Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-5621037694845750442013-08-07T13:10:00.000-07:002013-08-09T04:19:01.458-07:00The devil is in the detailI <span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">saw this train ad the other day from First Direct - I can't quite recall the offer as I filtered it out as not being relevant. But I actually quite liked this bit.</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjO3gDF8qtgSEKnwOxY_dqiyfMJPsU1hyphenhyphenrd2oMH7gBaWPazhfFQK4I3n54EaeeC8YC81UZtt-8zttlkXPwLFILQWuGqodFAychYhhcdb9d9BgG9TNJKJX-s18eYOLmQDCBuWoQ2UT3OO4pM/s1600/FD.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjO3gDF8qtgSEKnwOxY_dqiyfMJPsU1hyphenhyphenrd2oMH7gBaWPazhfFQK4I3n54EaeeC8YC81UZtt-8zttlkXPwLFILQWuGqodFAychYhhcdb9d9BgG9TNJKJX-s18eYOLmQDCBuWoQ2UT3OO4pM/s320/FD.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">The reason? That it utilised the small print. If you can't see it easily, it starts with 'Still with us? Good for you.' Do I like the message not particularly. The tone is not quite right. But it did make me smile may be because I am the kind of person who does read the small print.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Now this may sound odd - as small print is perceived as hiding away the parts of the deal that you don't want people to see or use to influence their decision making. But may be we should start to utilise it more in our creative. Openly.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Why do we need small print at all? Well because we often need to put quite a lot in a small space - but creatively we could use it better and encourage people to read it. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">I said it may sound odd. But really, do we want to get to a point where people feel misled or annoyed by what we are NOT clearly telling them? I don't. I think we may get better support if we are clearer about what's next for our supporters and potential supporters and start to manage the expectations better. Just a thought.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Thanks for stopping by.</span>Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-32107129170550677632013-07-26T02:38:00.000-07:002013-08-02T03:13:10.854-07:00What would possess you to walk a 1000 miles?<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">"But I would walk 500 miles and I would walk 500 more just to be the man who walked 1,000 miles.." Now no offense to the <a href="http://www.proclaimers.co.uk/%E2%80%8E">Proclaimers</a>, it really is a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tM0sTNtWDiI">great song</a> but other than the fact that a man struck with a romantic notion is willing to walk 1,000 miles for love - what does it really mean? I know 1,000 miles is a very long way - but it is difficult for me to put it into context and that is often the issue with using big numbers.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I like <a href="http://www.sightsavers.org/">Sightsavers</a>. I like what they do and I never fail to be moved by a charity that helps overcome sight loss in some of the poorest communities in the world.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Anyway, in the post this week I received a mailing and it was worthy of comment for a few reasons.</span><br />
<ul></ul>
<div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I am a fan of 'thank yous' and as an industry (in my opinion) we do not do it well enough. Often 'thank you' letters are an after thought, churned out at the last minute and merely recap on the last appeal they read and responded to. So a mailing dedicated to offering 'thanks' was very nice to receive.</span></div>
<div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">To be honest though when I saw it, I thought 'oh no'. It introduced lots of statistics that I have little chance of fully appreciating the scope but more than that I struggled as to where my contribution totally fits in. After all we are more likely to buy-in to supporting someone in need than we are to support a statistic?</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It also started down a route that frequently worries me, whereby the feedback tells you that you achieved huge change when you know you only give £5.00 per month for example. Not to say that the £5 is not adding value - but 'huge change' although difficult to qualify is a stretch. Accumulated with other £5.00s then the potential is indeed huge!</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I am sure there is a mathematical equation illustrating the gap between 'suspended disbelief' and 'feedback satisfaction' directly relating to the value of gift given and the claims made of its impact. I am no mathematician but there must be a point whereby the over zealous personalisation claiming that my generosity has built x in deepest darkest y can feel like too much of a stretch of reality to become a negative experience. Anyway, another post for another time. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhy3j7RunssfpCjo-32S_tfflthbW2xoQZSFSHu5vNAGxkyiT1OqcyTlCU-lHO_g4LtEPjFXMinVLO43U68z0y1bPMRrLFB3hVwgMaZ6FQNEFQ9D21P06Cv88UyRsdnWIow3RWb7J8ayUaR/s1600/Sight+Savers+1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhy3j7RunssfpCjo-32S_tfflthbW2xoQZSFSHu5vNAGxkyiT1OqcyTlCU-lHO_g4LtEPjFXMinVLO43U68z0y1bPMRrLFB3hVwgMaZ6FQNEFQ9D21P06Cv88UyRsdnWIow3RWb7J8ayUaR/s320/Sight+Savers+1.jpg" width="240" /></a></div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Okay, so back to the mailing, I read it. Now obviously this is not what all supporters will do but I read the bits I was meant to, the underlined copy, the PS, skimmer style and I found some wonderful sentiments that mitigated my negative feelings and some elements that packed a punch in delivering understanding of the issues faced by the visually impaired in the developing world and actually made me want to give.</span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIfdXtwydxRwc0YdkgScmPwchWQJSryyzVUKZ5U8sGUvO2bmvMMgIkwsk_Uz0cQS9YJ3WLLbni1pnBAtDZDbaBG4Xtcc8ORFoA66qlXlOITaRJFRRyCQ5uHaVjO-W1_EXzQE1yDuit0adQ/s1600/Sight+SAvers2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIfdXtwydxRwc0YdkgScmPwchWQJSryyzVUKZ5U8sGUvO2bmvMMgIkwsk_Uz0cQS9YJ3WLLbni1pnBAtDZDbaBG4Xtcc8ORFoA66qlXlOITaRJFRRyCQ5uHaVjO-W1_EXzQE1yDuit0adQ/s320/Sight+SAvers2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I was particularly struck by:</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">It was wonderful to be able to do so much, and we're all so grateful to you for your support. <b><i>But while those figures are exciting to us, you might be wondering how much your contribution could really have done to help.</i></b></span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">This was actually what I was wondering - and I do constantly - so I thought this addressed the issues very well and how nicely written. Lovely. Of course you could argue that if that was the question left hanging then why execute the piece in this way - but that would be churlish as I thought how they addressed it was really nice.<b><i> </i></b></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><b><i> </i></b></span> </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> And then the underlined text that followed. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><u>So let me assure you that you've helped boys and girls, mums and dads, grandparents, aunties and cousins in some of the poorest countries in the world. And their stories aren't about big numbers - they're about the small miracles that your support is making possible every day.</u></span> </span></div>
<div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Lovely sentiment once again and the power was in the juxtaposition created and reminding me that they are all those things to their families.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So I am feeling a little bit more reassured that my small gift has made a genuine difference - but will that be enough to make me give? This is, as I read on a thank you with an ask.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The answer is YES! And the main reason was this one sentence:</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">'....Among them are mothers who have never seen their children's faces. Fathers who can no longer work to support their families. Boys and girls who are shouted at for being 'stupid' and 'lazy' and who struggle to get the education they deserve.'</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It is amazing what grabs us as individuals, what presses a button that generates a visceral reaction and this was it, partly because I think such sentiment and honesty in presenting the situation for some 'beneficiaries' is seldom seen and because it takes some bravery from the organisation to be that honest. The words 'stupid' and 'lazy' rang out in my ears - the injustice and the cruelty stirred me.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I am obviously commenting based on my experience of portrayal of service users / beneficiaries - where the focus is more on not portraying the problem. This not only successfully portrays the issues but with very few words encapsulates the prejudice, the tone and attitudes that many blind or visually impaired people can face. Simple as that for me really. In that moment they had my gift. And with pleasure. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So all in all well done <a href="http://sightsavers.org/">Sightsavers</a> - I am still not convinced by leading with numbers but the right balance was struck for me - and I will happily accept your 'thank you' and you can do even more good with my donation.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Thanks as ever for stopping by.</span></div>
<div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-21368883310368456852013-06-28T03:27:00.000-07:002013-06-28T06:41:07.834-07:00Are you adding to your supporter's 'experience CV'<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There's a saying that money can't buy happiness - but a recent article in <a href="http://sciencefocus.com/">BBC Focus</a> magazine suggests it isn't so much the value of money but how you choose to spend it that gets you to the happy place.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The magazine is by subscription but the article<a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Happy-Money-Science-Smarter-Spending/dp/1451665067/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1372413940&sr=8-2&keywords=happy+money"> came out of the findings from this book</a> written by Elizabeth Dunn and Michael Norton, two Associate Professors from British Columbia and Harvard Business School respectively - which is well worth a read. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There is of course an obvious connection to philanthropy and the article again highlights that there is a clear link between supporter happiness and being shown where their money is spent comparing <a href="http://www.spreadthenet.org/">Spread the Net</a> and <a href="http://www.unicef.org.uk/">UNICEF</a> as an example. No surprise there.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">But within the article there were other interesting morsels that probably could also be better leveraged within the fundraising arena. An opportunity if you will. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>The experience CV</b> - the context of this is that day to day we make choices about the mundane versus the exciting. The commitment to get your dowdy bathroom refurbished versus visiting the Galapagos Islands for example. The point about this is that research from Cornell university indicated that people are less likely to regret buying experience than buying material things. In fact in research 80% of the people regretted not buying an experience when it was there because experience seems unique. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Here's the time to be looking at what experience you are actually offering to your supporters. For child sponsorship organisations for example offering the sponsors a chance to meet their sponsored child is an obvious one, for overseas development it could be getting people out to build a well, but this could be a little less obvious for other causes - though I am sure there are things that can be offered to make the difference between the transactional versus the experiential. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">As an extension of this - then the question may be - how can you if not in reality but virtually offer the opportunity for supporters to share time, any time with the people who benefit from their support? Another suggestion that came out of the research was that people feel better about spending money on others when we are part of the experience and spending time with them.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">All this is food for thought really - sometimes it isn't possible, practical, cost effective to directly link your supporters with your service users or beneficiaries - but who else could you link supporters with? Front line staff, programme workers? I know that all communications should be doing this any way - but in the same way we know tangibility beats the more general we are still not great at making that connection for supporters. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So this is merely a timely reminder </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">that we should probably do more to explore these options and implement them as much as possible within our own context. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It would be great to get to a point that giving to your cause could be worthy of being added to a supporter's experience CV in the same way that visiting the Serengeti would.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Thank you as ever for stopping by.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Amanda</span><br />
<br />Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2766957177339141031.post-63933983000263322252013-03-07T13:09:00.000-08:002013-03-17T15:31:59.620-07:00In pursuit of happiness<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I was recently reading some information about Sense's supporter base in the context of attrition and was struck by the the length of support of some of the supporters. Not because it was unexpected. I am sure many charities have cohorts of people who have been giving 5, 10, 20 plus years in the same way that we have people, (not using the word supporter here), who have not given at all or those that have lasted less than a year.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">What it did make me realise though, is that as an industry we tend to focus on why people stop giving - not a bad thing - as we now have great insights as to what we can do to meet people's needs to keep them supporting for longer. </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">B</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">ut still, I feel less focus has been on exploring why people are actually still giving. After all very few people start giving without reason there are various reasons and influences, conscious and subconscious. We measure net promoters scores and have satisfaction surveys but we don't proactively ask what has kept someone giving these past 5 years, the last decade, the last two decades and use this knowledge to inform the next twenty years.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Even from a supporter care perspective, acknowledging and recognising this amazing commitment is a good thing to do but phoning and having a chat and asking some of these kind people what has kept them giving to you despite recessions, changes in there life stages and possibly as a result, their financial circumstances, as well as changes in your organisation's brand for example</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> would be brilliant to know. After all, they are doing what you have asked of them - they have made the choice to act and are continuing to do so - even if this is through inertia. Though interesting article <a href="http://www.acacia-avenue.com/media/1282731151Inertia_is_good.pdf">here on why inertia is no bad thing.</a></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Of course some of this will be covered off in your own research - whether it be focus groups or in-depth interviews. But I am not sure the starting point will be framed so positively i.e. 'what keeps you happily supporting xxx?'</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So along with lapsed donor research, I will look forward to 'Retained donor research' as well and will start by doing some of my own. After all we all are in pursuit of the state of the happy donor - and though we may be being a little presumptuous that they are - we should at least ask on that basis.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">And of course I would love to hear if anyone has been exploring the happiness of their donors and what they found out.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Thanks as ever for stopping by.</span>Amanda Santerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15775571819595962482noreply@blogger.com1